Various trauma professionals (prehospital, emergency physician, surgeon) may provide this “service” at various places around the world. In the US, it is usually a physician and typically a surgeon. In my opinion, anyone can be trained to do a basic field amputation.

Much depends on local policies and procedures, training, as well as availability. In most cases, prehospital providers are on the scene, so it makes sense that they could do a field amputation with appropriate training. Emergency physicians have more experience with airway management, sedation, and anesthesia and can thus add value to the process.

But again, in my opinion, a trauma surgeon is the best choice for performing this procedure. They have the technical skills and are usually facile with anesthesia and sedation. However, they also have a deep understanding of the anatomy involved and the eventual reconstruction process. This allows them to tailor the amputation to optimize the eventual recovery from this operation. The surgeon does not necessarily have to resort to a guillotine-type amputation. And they are better versed in performing amputations that involve the upper extremity, as well as more proximal amputations (shoulder, upper thigh). And if unexpected bleeding occurs that cannot be controlled by a tourniquet, they know what to do.

The only downside to using a physician is availability. Getting them to the scene will always take extra time since they are typically hospital-based. In contrast, the prehospital providers are already present and are used to working in an austere environment.

Bottom line: There is no cookbook for developing a field amputation policy and procedure. Look at your local resources and the logistics imposed by the environment, traffic, hospital, and other factors. Then figure out what works for you. Borrow from other centers and agencies, and make the process as simple as possible. Due to the very rare need for field amputation, you will need to periodically review the process and the location of your packs so people don’t forget.

In my next post, I’ll cover the challenging logistics of field amputation.

There are basically four indications, two absolute and two relative:

• Absolute #1: entrapped extremity with a lengthy extrication and a physiologically impaired patient who does not respond to fluids. In this case, there is occult blood loss in other areas that is killing your patient, and they need to get out quickly for definitive management.
• Absolute #2: entrapped extremity with a lengthy extrication and an unstable physical environment. Examples include entrapment in a structurally damaged building or a vehicle in danger of falling, exploding, etc.
• Relative #1: entrapped extremity with a lengthy extrication in a patient who was initially hypotensive but responded to IV fluids. Waiting for additional extrication efforts is possible, but vital signs must be monitored closely. At the first sign of recurrent hypotension, it’s time to amputate.
• Relative #2: entrapped extremity and physiologically normal, but extrication may take many hours or be impossible. Once again, there is time to wait and let rescue workers continue their efforts. However, the more time passes, the less likely the extremity will ultimately be functional.

Obviously, a lot of thought and judgment goes into deciding to amputate. Having another physician to discuss the facts with is helpful, but as the treating trauma professional, the ultimate decision is yours. If appropriate, there may also be an opportunity to discuss with the patient and/or their family.

In the next post in this series, I’ll discuss who performs the field amputation.

Field amputation is not thought of very often, and for good reason. It is unpleasant, uncommon, and not very safe for trauma professionals due to the austere environment. I will dedicate the next several posts to the topic, starting with some of the facts.

First, let’s start with definitions. Two distinct procedures are discussed here.

The first and most commonly described is field amputation. This is the removal of a body part in a living person to extricate them from a situation in which all other attempts have failed.

The other procedure is field dismemberment. This is the surgical alteration of a dead body to extricate another living person who is entrapped, where there is no other route of egress. This is less taxing, both surgically and psychologically, for all involved. For this reason, I’ll focus on field amputation for the rest of this issue.
In reality, these procedures are discussed much more often than performed. And there are far more papers written than actual documented cases. There is one old paper that is cited frequently which consisted of a survey from 1996! A search of the literature at that time only yielded two case descriptions.

In the 1996 study, surveys were sent out to EMS directors in North America’s 200 largest metropolitan areas. A total of 143 directors responded.

Here are the factoids:

• There were 26 amputations performed over a five-year period
• Nine additional cases were identified where it was believed that the procedure was indicated but not performed
• The most common mechanism was motor vehicle crash (27%), followed by industrial machinery (23%)
• 53% were (or would have been) performed by a trauma surgeon, 36% by an emergency physician, and a paramedic in 14%. Five respondents had no idea who would do it. (More than one choice was possible, hence total is > 100%)
• No training was available for this procedure, although a few had training on how to deal with the amputated part
• Only 2 EMS systems had an existing policy or protocol (1%)

An informal poll of trauma surgeons at a national American College of Surgeons meeting several years ago showed that only five had ever been called to do a field amputation, and only two had actually done it.

Uncommonly performed procedures are always problematic. It is extremely difficult to keep skills sharp (pun) and to remember the protocol, equipment, and where to find them. Furthermore, these procedures are prone to error and pose considerable risk to all involved

And if there are no policies or guidance, it is possible that the procedure may actually not be done in cases where it should. Therefore, effective policies must be put in place to accomplish these five things:

1. Define situations where in-field amputation may be necessary
2. Notify online medical direction of possible need for amputation
3. Notification and mobilization of the appropriate physician
4. Transport of the response team and equipment to the scene
5. Transport of the patient to the appropriate receiving facility

In the next post, I’ll review the indications for field amputation.

Reference: In-Field Extremity Amputation: Prevalence and Protocols in Emergency Medical Services. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 11(1):63-66, 1996